Constitutional Amendment LTE template
Letters are limited to 250 words.
Fill out this form and write or copy and paste your letter in the box provided
You will receive a call to verify it was you who sent the letter.
POTENTIAL LEDE: The Constiution is meant to be sacred and treated seriously. It is not meant to be used to effect policy change you failed to get through via the legislative process. Yet that is how Republicans have been using our sacred document the past six years.
Vote No on all three Constitutional Amendments, especially on Question 2
In the past six years, the GOP has proposed 13 Constitutional Amendments after just three the previous decade.
Republicans are using the amendment process because they can’t get their wish list past Gov. Evers veto pen. This is the way divided government is meant to work.
This is not the proper use of amendments and weakens our Constitution and our democracy.
Almost none of those 13 initiatives have pertained to the Constitution but have instead been GOP policy objectives
Why the so-called Equality Amendment is bad and misleading
The language is purposely vague and overbroad
It is actually anti-equity and would do untold damage to underserved communities who have relied on equity to get fair treatment after years of discrimination.
While this amendment claims to want to end preferential treatment, it actually seeks to deny equitable treatment for those who have historically been ignored or discriminated against
The potential fallout from this amendment included:
Minority-owned businesses would not longer have to be equally considered by the government
Greater health inequity for certain populations
Certain minority-directed curriculum could be deemed too ethnic and be eliminated
Grants could be denied simply because they mentioned certain races, genders or ethnicities
Literacy organizations could lose funding
Equitable hiring practices could end
Protections for all historically underserved or discriminated against populations would end
Comments
Post a Comment